For the purposes of Planning Act requirements, the following person(s) made an oral submission.
Adrian Chee, presented on behalf of the applicant.
Jeremy Hammond, opposed to the proposal, doesn't believe it fits with the town zoning policies, suggests the development doesn't fit within the character of the neighbourhood.
Dan Meskell, opposed to the proposal, concerns regarding the traffic surrounding school bus pick ups and bus stops, suggested the design of the homes minimize the quality of the heritage district.
Sue Chalykoff, opposed to the proposal, concerned about the changes proposed to the zoning regulations, as well as the narrow set backs, overcrowding of properties, building heights, snow removal. Suggested five lots may be more appropriate than seven.
Cody Cornale, opposed to the proposal, concerned about road safety with extra driveway since the area has high pedestrian traffic with a lot of kids. Suggested the proposal is not within character of neighbourhood
Jim Lawson, opposed to the proposal, suggested the development proposal doesn't consider the character of the neighbourhood, and filed a submission.
Claire Merry, on behalf of the Trafalgar Chartwell Residents Association, supports that the development is single dwelling, agrees with all the other speakers and suggests that the proposal is not appropriate zoning compared to the rest of the neighbourhood. Concerns about consistency with the Livable Oakville Plan, the character of the heritage neighbourhood, traffic and kids who take the bus. Suggested a single car driveway or more scaled down version may be more appropriate.